Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric Massachusetts. Cmr 35 02 are a critical component of the massachusetts educator evaluation framework and are required for every educator rubrics are designed to help educators and evaluators 1 develop a consistent shared understanding of what proficient performance looks like in practice 2 develop a common terminology and structure to organize evidence and 3 make informed professional. Teacher evaluation rubrics by kim marshall revised august 21 2011 rationale and suggestions for implementation 1.
The dimension is purpose the subdimension is standards and the indicator is connection to standards broader purpose and transferable skill. In 2017 the board made a major change to the evaluation system eliminating a separate student impact rating based on district determined measures and instead requiring that student learning measures be included in the summative evaluation. The teacher performance evaluation rubric is intended to be scored holistically.
Teacher evaluation rubrics by kim marshall revised august 21 2011 rationale and suggestions for implementation 1.
The massachusetts educator evaluation system adopted in 2011 by the board of elementary and secondary education establishes standards and requirements for teachers and administrators. The advantage to a. Rubrics defined in the regulations as scoring tool s that describe characteristics of practice or artifacts at different levels of performance 603 cmr 35 02 are a critical component of the massachusetts educator evaluation framework and are required for every educator. The four level teacher performance rubric created by the massachusetts dese was designed to be general enough for local districts to assign their own specific observable behaviors to represent each of the elements.