Water Footprint Of Meat. The water footprint of beef is primarily impacted by how much and what the cattle eat. When we consider grazing systems the blue and grey water footprints of poultry and pork are greater than those for beef.
The water footprint of beef is primarily impacted by how much and what the cattle eat. Let s take a look at the water footprint comparison. Lamb 5 301 liters of water used to produce 1 kilogram of lamb carcasses and half carcasses fresh or chilled 635 gallons of water used to produce 1 pound of lamb carcasses and half carcasses fresh or chilled a relatively high water footprint.
The water footprint of beef.
The water footprint of meat is contested by some in the livestock industry who disagree with how the water footprint is calculated. Let s take a look at the water footprint comparison. The water footprint of beef is primarily impacted by how much and what the cattle eat. Pound for pound meat has a much higher water footprint than vegetables grains or beans.
